Richard Masters breaks silence in letter to premier league clubs after Manchester City bombshell
Premier League Museum Admin 
Richard Masters Premier League
The Premier League, under the leadership of chief executive Richard Masters, is currently deliberating on amendments to key sponsorship rules. This process comes amidst a backdrop of concerns raised by several clubs, including Leicester City, about the current system’s effectiveness.
Richard Masters has communicated with clubs regarding the ongoing development of amendments. Masters said, “We are taking the necessary time to develop our proposals and the associated draft rule amendments for club consideration. It’s as simple as that. There have been many club conversations over recent days, with constructive and informative feedback provided.”
Leicester City has been particularly active in the wake of a significant ruling related to their ongoing case against the league. They have contacted their counterparts, asserting that the league’s interpretation of certain rules was ‘incorrect’. Clubs gathered to discuss these issues, although any voting or decisions at the planned meeting remain uncertain. According to reports, some clubs anticipate that Leicester City will present an extensive critique of the existing system. It is also noted that the Premier League will not attempt to set a timeline for a new APT (Advanced Payment Terms) system.
Aston Villa, along with Newcastle United and Chelsea, have shown sympathy towards Leicester City’s stance. Furthermore, Everton has backed Leicester City, while Nottingham Forest’s owner, Evangelos Marinakis, may also be an ally. On the other hand, clubs like Arsenal, Manchester United, Liverpool, West Ham, Brentford, Bournemouth, Fulham, and Wolves, have voiced support for the Premier League’s current stance.
As of now, Leicester City’s precise stance remains unclarified, though their previous encounter with the Premier League over the PSR (Profitability and Sustainability Regulations) suggests a cautious approach. Their victory in that dispute helped them avoid the threat of a significant points deduction.
About The Author
