Joey Barton Newcastle United
**
In a recent legal development, Joey Barton, the former Newcastle United player, has been convicted at Liverpool Crown Court for making offensive posts on the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. The 43-year-old was found guilty of several charges, including making derogatory comments about Eniola Aluko and Jeremy Vine.
The jury stated: “crossed the line between free speech and a crime” with six posts he made on X.
The court heard that Barton compared Aluko to infamous historical figures, claiming she “murdered hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of football fans’ ears.” He was also convicted for a post suggesting that Aluko was “only there to tick boxes,” dismissing diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives as “a load of s***” and describing them as “affirmative action.”
Barton tweeted: “Only there to tick boxes. DEI is a load of s***. Affirmative action. All off the back of the BLM/George Floyd nonsense.”
Additionally, Barton was found guilty of making offensive remarks about Jeremy Vine, repeatedly referring to him as “bike nonce” and making insinuations about his involvement with Jeffrey Epstein. Barton suggested that Vine might appear on flight logs linked to Epstein and advised people to call the police if they saw Vine near a primary school.
Barton wrote: “Have you been on Epstein Island? Are you going to be on these flight logs? Might as well own up now because I’d phone the police if I saw you near a primary school on ya bike.”
Despite being cleared of three other tweets concerning Vine, Barton was bailed ahead of his sentencing, which is set for December 8. The Honorary Recorder of Liverpool, Andrew Menary KC, noted that Barton wore a Union Jack patterned scarf as the verdicts were delivered, suggesting it was a deliberate act to make a point.
This case highlights the ongoing challenges of balancing free speech with the potential for harm on social media platforms. Barton’s conviction serves as a reminder of the legal boundaries that exist in online communications, particularly when comments are deemed to incite hatred or violence. As the sentencing date approaches, the football community and the public await further developments in this high-profile case.
About The Author
